Persecution Christians India

Death sentence for Pakistan woman turned on technicality
Published: November 19, 2014 by Asif Aqeel

Letting death penalty stand, court seeks to close loophole

The Lahore High Court in a 2006 photo.
The Lahore High Court in a 2006 photo.John Milton / Flickr / Creative Commons
The Pakistan court that a month ago said Aasiya Noreen, a Christian, must die for the crime of insulting Islam, based its ruling on a legal technicality that it now wants to eliminate.
The Lahore High Court, an appeals court for Pakistan’s largest province, had decided Oct. 16 that it would let stand the 2010 conviction of Noreen, a day-labor berry picker whose argument with a Muslim coworker blew up into a highly charged test of the country’s anti-blasphemy laws, which are widely criticized abroad but popular among voters in the Muslim-majority nation.
The appeals judges now explain they had no choice, given the way Pakistan’s laws are written, and have turned to lawmakers to craft legislation that would empower trial courts to apply a test that would make future blasphemy convictions much more difficult to achieve. That test was not in place when Noreen, popularly known as Asia Bibi, was tried.
The High Court’s detailed legal reasoning, as well as its intention to close the loophole through which it says Noreen has fallen, is contained in a Nov. 5 written decision that was not available on Oct. 16 when the court ruled from the bench that her original conviction will stand. In Pakistan, blasphemy against Mohammed, the prophet of Islam, carries the requirement of the death penalty, though it has never been carried out.
The written judgment was released the day after a Pakistani Christian couple was brutally murdered after an alleged blasphemy.
“The bench has referred the case to the executive for consideration after identifying a legal glitch,” said Abid Saqi, former President of Lahore High Court Bar Association.
That glitch, he said, involves a legal principle found in Islamic law called tazkiya al shuhood. It requires accusers to meet strict standards of Islamic piety, and it came into play when Noreen’s lawyer, Naeem Shakir, embarked on an unconventional legal strategy: To attempt to subject his Christian client to Islamic law rather than Pakistan’s secular laws.

The Aasiya Noreen story

Aasiya Noreen, commonly known as Asia Bibi, received the death penalty in 2010 after she allegedly made derogatory comments about the Prophet Mohammed during an argument with a Muslim woman.
While the two women were working together, the Muslim woman had refused water from Noreen on the grounds that it was unclean because it had been handled by a Christian.
The Muslim woman, together with her sister, were the only two witnesses in the case, but the defence failed to convince the appeals judges that their evidence lacked credibility.
Noreen, first arrested in the summer of 2009, has already spent five years in prison. Her defence team has one more opportunity to appeal her case by taking it to Pakistan’s Supreme Court.
Noreen was accused of blasphemy against the Prophet of Islam and the Qur’an in June 2009, when she was working in the fields as a laborer in Sheikhupura. A religious argument broke out between her and her co-workers after she brought water for one of them. One of her co-workers objected that the mere touch of a Christian had made the water haram, or religiously forbidden for Muslims. Noreen was told to convert to Islam in order to become purified of her ritual impurity. Her rejoinder was perceived as an insult of Islam and hence she was accused of committing blasphemy.
Muhammad Amin Bukhari, the Superintendent of Police who investigated Noreen’s case, testified in the trial court that the religious argument broke out over the drinking water. The trial court judge convicted her and gave her the death penalty.
Noreen’s case attracted widespread global attention, much of it critical of Pakistan’s anti-blasphemy laws, which critics contend are routinely abused as pretext to settle personal scores. Two prominent Pakistani politicians were assassinated in 2010 after they spoke publicly in Noreen’s defense.
Pakistan’s Federal Shariat Court, which determines whether the country’s laws comply with the principles of Islam, declared in 1990 that insulting the prophet qualifies as hadd – a category of crimes and punishments prescribed in the Qur’an and the tradition of the Prophet. Accordingly, the only acceptable penalty is death, the Shariat Court ruled.
And that, in turn, requires the strictest standards of evidence, or tazkiya al shuhood, Shakir argued to the Lahore High Court in October. He pointed to a 1992 decision by the Pakistan Supreme Court, which ruled that “[w]hat the expression tazkiya al shuhood signifies and connotes is to require elaborate enquiry into the piety, uprightness and integrity of the witness from the men of the same virtues.”
Those stringent barriers were not used at Noreen’s 2010 court trial, rendering the conviction invalid, Shakir argued.
In their written ruling released Nov. 5, High Court judges Muhammad Anwaarul Haq and Syed Shahbaz Ali Rizvi upheld Noreen’s conviction and death penalty based largely on a shoddy trial defense that failed to cross-examine prosecution witnesses. Left unchallenged, the prosecution’s case prevailed by default, the appeals judges said.
Noreen’s trial lawyer, S.K. Chaudhry, who also was present at the appeal hearing, had previously said he dared not speak the allegedly blasphemous remarks to Noreen’s accusers in court, lest he be accused of blasphemy himself.
The High Court’s ruling brushed aside the 1992 Supreme Court guidance on tazkiya al shuhood, saying the accused in that case had been acquitted on the merits of the evidence even without the benefit of the stricter standards, leaving open the question of whether those standards ought to be employed generally.
The ruling was silent on the question of hadd in Noreen’s case and whether the attendant higher legal barriers to prosecution ought to have been employed. The judges did, however, suggest the trial court could have made that determination if it had been equipped with guidelines for applying the legal test:
“In the absence of any corresponding amendment in procedural law for testing credibility of a witness at such a higher standard, the principle of Tazkiyah al Shuhood cannot be applied in other cases,” the ruling said. It expressed the “utmost necessity for necessary corresponding amendments in procedural law for the proof of an offence where only sentence provided is death.”
The judges ordered that the Ministry of Law, Justice and Human Rights transmit the court’s request to the Pakistan government.
If the government complies with the High Court’s request – a separate matter entirely -- blasphemy defendants in Pakistan theoretically could place nearly insurmountable barriers in front of accusers. Those barriers might have prevented a Lahore trial court from handing down a death sentence in March to Sawan Masih, accused of insulting the Prophet during a night of drinking and conversation with a Muslim friend in 2013. Two days after their conversation, thousands of Muslims looted and torched Christian homes and churches throughout Lahore’s Joseph Colony, displacing hundreds of families.
Drinking liquor is punishable under Islamic law. The tazkiyah al shuhood standard, demanding strict adherence to Islamic principles from witnesses, presumably would have disqualified the testimony of Masih’s accuser.
Placing the matter in the hands of Pakistan lawmakers opens the possibility of renewed public debate over an extremely sensitive issue for the country. Politicians have been killed for speaking out in favor of reform.
Hafiz Tahir Ashrafi, a staunch supporter of Pakistan's anti-blasphemy laws, nonetheless told World Watch Monitor he views the High Court’s request favorably. “In all cases, the evidence must meet the standards prescribed in the Islamic jurisprudence,” said Ashrafi, chairman of the Pakistan Ulema Council, a body of Islamic clerics and scholars.
However, Ghulam Mustafa Chaudhry, a lawyer who represented Noreen’s accuser, said there’s no need to expand the application of tazkiyah al shuhood.
“The current anti-blasphemy laws were perfectly fine and there is no need to introduce any procedural amendment in them,” Chaudhry told World Watch Monitor.
Chaudhry, president of the Khatme Nabuwat (Finality of Prophethood) Lawyers’ Forum, said in death penalty cases, a superintendent of police is appointed to collect evidence. “Junior officers can do hanky-panky but not senior officers of the SP post. So enquiry by them already means a high standard of evidence,” he said.
“If one really insists on the tazkiyah al shuhood standard of evidence then it shouldn’t just apply on witnesses, the [judge] should also be appointed based on the Islamic standards not the way our current judges who are selected by political parties,” Chaudhry said. “Even the entire society must operate on Islamic principles rather than just cherry picked laws that suit to the interests of certain people.”









The Aasiya Noreen story

Aasiya Noreen, commonly known as Asia Bibi, received the death penalty in 2010 after she allegedly made derogatory comments about the Prophet Mohammed during an argument with a Muslim woman.
While the two women were working together, the Muslim woman had refused water from Noreen on the grounds that it was unclean because it had been handled by a Christian.
The Muslim woman, together with her sister, were the only two witnesses in the case, but the defence failed to convince the appeals judges that their evidence lacked credibility.
Noreen, first arrested in the summer of 2009, has already spent five years in prison. Her defence team has one more opportunity to appeal her case by taking it to Pakistan’s Supreme Court.
Noreen was accused of blasphemy against the Prophet of Islam and the Qur’an in June 2009, when she was working in the fields as a laborer in Sheikhupura. A religious argument broke out between her and her co-workers after she brought water for one of them. One of her co-workers objected that the mere touch of a Christian had made the water haram, or religiously forbidden for Muslims. Noreen was told to convert to Islam in order to become purified of her ritual impurity. Her rejoinder was perceived as an insult of Islam and hence she was accused of committing blasphemy.
Muhammad Amin Bukhari, the Superintendent of Police who investigated Noreen’s case, testified in the trial court that the religious argument broke out over the drinking water. The trial court judge convicted her and gave her the death penalty.
Noreen’s case attracted widespread global attention, much of it critical of Pakistan’s anti-blasphemy laws, which critics contend are routinely abused as pretext to settle personal scores. Two prominent Pakistani politicians were assassinated in 2010 after they spoke publicly in Noreen’s defense.
























































http://www.bibbia.net/




Holy my JHWH santo KADOSH, KADOSH, KADOSH, ADONAI TSEBAIOT, Salmān bin ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Āl Saʿūd è re dell'Arabia Saudita ] amico E FRATELLO [ neanche quella testa di cazzo di Erdogan, che sogna di rifare l'impero Ottomano ecc.. ecc.. è così cretino da non voler evitare una guerra nucleare [ quindi tutti i Governi del mondo faranno tutto quello che noi decideremo di fare semplicemente perché noi siamo la verità e siamo la giustizia! PER ABBATTERE LA USURA MONDIALE, SPA, BANCA MONDIALE, NOI DOBBIAMO COSTRINGERE TUTTI GLI EBREI (tutte le 12 Tribù) DEL MONDO A RITORNARE NEL MIO REGNO UNIUS REI!
Rispondi
 · 
 
Holy my JHWH santo KADOSH, KADOSH, KADOSH, ADONAI TSEBAIOT, Salmān bin ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Āl Saʿūd è re dell'Arabia Saudita ] amico il tuo scoraggiamento, è un attacco demonico, dei satanisti, e non ha nulla di razionale.. Quando fu rubato il SIGNORAGGIO BANCARIO, tutto è andato verso il peggio, ed ora nessuno sa come affrontare, un problema, mentre contemporaneamente si formano altri 1000 problemi. MA SE NOI RIPRISTINIAMO LA SOVRANITà DEI POPOLI, E SE, NOI PARTIAMO DAL PRINCIPIO CHE OGNI UOMO DI QUESTO PIANETA, HA GLI STESSI DIRITTI E DOVERI, DI OGNI ALTRO UOMO.. poi, tutti i problemi del mondo si distruggeranno da soli! TU PUOI CREDERE CON ME NELLA POTENZA DELLO SPIRITO SANTO!
Rispondi
 · 
 
youtube ] ma tu hai avuto, SEMPRE AVUTO: il mio permesso di cancellarmi tutti i video che tu vuoi.. NON VOGLIO CHE LE TANTE MERDE PIENI DI SOLDI RUBATI NEL SISTEMA MASSONICO SPA SIGNORAGGIO BANCARIO DEBBANO SOFFOCARE IL SANGUE DEI MARTIRI CRISTIANI.. Ed il sangue di tutti i popoli trasformati in schiavi della usurocrazia mondiale, che prevede in modo tecnico e funzionale la guerra mondiale per riaprire un nuovo ciclo monetario devitalizzante ed usurocratico
Rispondi
 · 
 
BERLUSCONI BOIA BESTIA BESTIONE VATTENE TRADITORE! ] [ LA MASSONERIA mi sta facendo attaccare da: SILVIO BERLUSCONI, MEDIASET, R.T.I. [ Copyright    Cattiva reputazione • Scadenza: 13 giu 2016. Se ricevi un altro avvertimento, il tuo account verrà sospeso. AVVERTIMENTO 1 [ ID video: vN6OhUeuwfM Rivendicato da R.T.I. il 10 dic 2014. Invia contronotifica. AVVERTIMENTO 2 [ Superpartes intervista Giorgia Meloni ID video: Ft8bG9dM-rM
Rivendicato da R.T.I. il 19 giu 2015 ADESSO LO SANNO TUTTI è LA MASSONERIA CHE HA FATTO DISTRUGGERE IL 40% DI TUTTI I MIEI CANALI DI YOUTUBE, SPUTANDO IN QUESTO MODO SUL SANGUE DEI POPOLI E SUL SANGUE DEI MARTIRI CRISTIANI! ] [ BERLUSCONI BESTIA BESTIONE VATTENE!
Rispondi
 · 
 
Persecution of Christians in India [ ALMENO,altri 10 VIDEO DEL GENERE che MI SONO STATI DISTRUTTI non li ho riportati in questo elenco  ] AL SISTEMA MASSONICO ROTHSCHILD BILDENBERG [ io non so chi è così interessato a distruggere la testimonianza del martirio dei cristiani, se non, PROPRIO, chi è il vero responsabile: IDEOLOGICO della loro morte! ]
NON è LA PRIMA VOLTA CHE ISLAMICI SI FINGONO I PADRONI DEL VIDEO,  di innocenti MARTIRI CRISTIANI PER NASCONDERE I LORO DELITTI SHARIA nazismo ONU NWO.
** INDIA INCREASE ANIMOSITY vs CHRISTIANS 18 maggio 2014. Rifiutato (nuovo caricamento consentito)
** Attack Pastor Walter Masih in Jaipur 18 maggio 2014.  Rifiutato (nuovo caricamento consentito)
** What is Christianity 18 maggio 2014 Rifiutato (nuovo caricamento consentito) Ricorso  »
** Islam Muslims converting Christianity Rene 18 maggio 2014 Rifiutato (nuovo caricamento consentito) Ricorso
** Hindu Accepts Jesus Lord and Saviour 18 maggio 2014 Rifiutato (nuovo caricamento consentito) Ricorso  »
** Egypt More muslims embrace Christ 18 maggio 2014 Rifiutato (nuovo caricamento consentito) Ricorso
** Turkish attempt Exterminate Syrials Armenians Rifiutato (nuovo caricamento consentito) Ricorso  »
** indonesia bibleschool 19 marzo 2014 Rifiutato (nuovo caricamento consentito) Ricorso  »
** Dr C J Johnson Better Run 19 marzo 2014 Rifiutato (nuovo caricamento consentito) Ricorso  »
MA IO NON HO LE COMPETENZE PER IMPUGNARE CONTENZIOSO SU VIDEO CHE NON SONO MIEI, MA, INDUBBIAMENTE CI SONO FORZE NAZISTE, ISLAMICHE spa FMI FED BCE, USURA MONDIALE, SISTEMA MASSONICO, CHE VOGLIONO NASCONDERE ANCHE LE TRACCIE DEI LORO DELITTI
Monetizzazione. Questo account non è idoneo a causa della sua reputazione.